You are currently visiting the test version of the radboud Dspace repository. To access the production instance, you can navigate to: https://repository.ubn.ru.nl

Fulltext:
97192.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
363.9Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2011Source
Ageing Research Reviews, 10, 1, (2011), pp. 104-14ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
IQ Healthcare
Geriatrics
Rehabilitation
Journal title
Ageing Research Reviews
Volume
vol. 10
Issue
iss. 1
Page start
p. 104
Page end
p. 14
Subject
NCEBP 11: Alzheimer Centre; NCEBP 6: Quality of nursing and allied health careAbstract
Frailty is one of the greatest challenges for healthcare professionals. The level of frailty depends on several interrelated factors and can change over time while different interventions seem to be able to influence the level of frailty. Therefore, an outcome instrument to measure frailty with sound clinimetric properties is needed. A systematic review on evaluative measures of frailty was performed in the databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cinahl and Cochrane. The results show numerous instruments that measure the level of frailty. This article gives a clear overview of the content of these frailty instruments and describes their clinimetric properties. Frailty instruments, however, are often developed as prognostic instruments and have also been validated as such. The clinimetric properties of these instruments as evaluative outcome measures are unclear.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [244578]
- Electronic publications [132441]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [92890]
Upload full text
Use your RU or RadboudUMC credentials to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.